Guildelines

A well-defined research issue should be the starting point of any scientific analysis, which should conclude with a useful analysis methodology that lays out the overall strategy. This basis should provide a body of information from which the document may be derived.

Submissions of manuscripts to journals for consideration for publication often contain the following components. Consequently, rather than serving to further obfuscate the ideas and findings, the text itself should serve to enhance the effort of communicating the scientific evidence.

Title Page:

There should be a title page. Mention the authors and their affiliations with the manuscript’s title, which should be brief and straightforward. Declare which journal you are submitting the work to. List around five essential terms together with a brief title (sometimes known as a running title) for the work. Lastly, include the related author’s full contact information.

Abstract:

Usually, the abstract is one paragraph long.The abstract should be viewed as a freelancing document for an associate’s degree in nursing, meaning that no information in the abstract depends on any information in the report’s body, and vice versa.The experiment’s goal should be stated explicitly in the opening phrase.If a hypothesis is used to guide the experiment—which is highly recommended—it should be clearly expressed and accompanied by statements outlining its foundation and assessment.The phrases that follow explain how the inquiry was conducted.The outcomes of the experiment are described in the following phrases as precisely as possible without being lengthy. The concluding phrases highlight the significance of the findings and, consequently, how this effort will affect the ultimate subject of research.

Introduction:

A succinct summary of the literature addressing the analysis issue is necessary for the introduction. The ideal way to structure the introduction is like a descriptive funnel: start with a wide range of subjects and gradually narrow it down to the job at hand. It could take three or four paragraphs. Another strategy is to begin by introducing the reader to the ultimate subject of study in one or two paragraphs. Then, a section of this field can be improved, as explained in the following paragraphs. The last paragraph is really important. It is very evident what experimental question the current investigation is trying to solve, probably in the first phrase of the paragraph. Next, the hypothesis is made clear. Next, briefly outline the strategy used to verify the hypothesis.Lastly, an overview phrase adds further information by indicating how the answer to your query might advance the subject of research as a whole.

Methods:

This section should be a straightforward description of the methods used in your study. Each technique ought to be delineated during a separate section. Begin, in a single section, with a statement of the materials used in the study, indicating the vendor and vendor contact information for each material. This data is crucial in order that readers have the aptitude to repeat the add their own establishments. NeXT describe, in separate sections, each key procedure and technique used in the study. Keep explanations brief and concise. If a selected experimental style is employed, describe this style within the second section of the ways, after the materials section. Similarly, if a theoretical or modeling element is employed, it ought to even be incorporated within the initial portion of the ways.

Finally, remember to describe the statistical analysis methods that were utilized to analyze the results, most likely in the final section of the Methods section. Although it is typically not recommended, the use of the passive voice is probably appropriate in the Methods section.

Results:

The Results section presents the experimental information to the reader and is not a place for discussion or interpretation of the data. The data itself ought to be given in tables and figures (see below).

Introduce every cluster of tables and figures during a separate paragraph wherever the general trends and information points of explicit interest square measure noted. You may need to point the position of a selected table or figure within the text.

For experimental studies, key statistics such as the number of samples (n), the index of dispersion (SD, SEM), and the index of central tendency (mean, median or mode) must be stated. Include any applied math analysis that was performed, and make sure to indicate specific statistical data, such as p-values.

Note that every table and figure within the paper should be said within the Results section.

Discussion:

The discussion section, often the most difficult to write, should be relatively easy if the previous suggestions have been followed. In explicit, look to the last paragraph of the introduction. If the work has characterized a development by finding out specific effects, use the results to describe each effect in separate paragraphs.

If the work has presented a hypothesis, use the results to construct a logical argument that supports or rejects your hypothesis. If the work has identified three main objectives for the work, use the results to address each of these objectives. A well-defined study that is described in the Introduction, along with supporting results that are presented in the Results section, should ease the construction of the Discussion section. Begin the Discussion section with a short paragraph that once more provides an outline to the work.

Summarize the most important findings and, if applicable, accept or reject the proposed hypothesis. Next, identify the most interesting, significant, remarkable findings that were presented in the Results section, and contrast these findings in light of other studies reported in the literature. It is usually informative if a discussion of the potential weaknesses of the interpretation is additionally enclosed.

Finally, at the end of the Discussion section, consider the other works in the literature that address this topic and how this work contributes to the overall field of study.

Conclusions:

Again, initial introduce the work and so in brief state the main results. Then state the major points of the discussion. Finally, finish with a press release of however this work contributes to the general field of study.